Crypto wallet MetaMask used to be swept up in controversy over the weekend as a resolution of Twitter users shared a misinterpretation of the firm’s terms of service.

Some users pointed to allotment 4.3 of the Charges and Fee allotment, which apparently implied that MetaMask reserves the gorgeous to withhold taxes the build required when a user is at menace of pay them.

Consensys, the parent firm of MetaMask, clarified on Sunday that the terms on this allotment refer completely to paid plans and merchandise equipped by the firm and no longer on-chain crypto transfers.

“For example, Infura has bank card developer subscriptions which embody sales tax,” explained ConsenSys.

“Upright terminology would possibly even be advanced, however it’s well-known to emphasise that this allotment DOES NOT note to MetaMask or any different merchandise that don’t involve sales tax,” they added.

Earlier this Three hundred and sixty five days, MetaMask made changes to the settings of users’ wallet accounts, allowing them to separate different accounts for diverse functions. Before the update, all accounts tied to 1 user were automatically linked when connected to an on-chain utility. By de-linking them, users would possibly well also decide for added privacy by segregating their public-going via accounts from their personal ones that facilitate DeFi degen activities.

The firm also upgraded its browser extension to restrict the amount of files sent to third-birthday party services and products in accordance with the backlash received over a privacy policy update in November. Customers can now disable aspects that ship requests to third-birthday party APIs via the platform’s evolved configuration settings, giving them extra preserve watch over over their data.