Plaintiffs in a lawsuit in opposition to the U.S. Treasury over its ban on crypto privateness mixer Twister Cash own requested for a ruling on some appropriate issues with the case.

In a movement filed on April 5, the plaintiffs called for a summary judgement to be issued on the first two counts of its normal criticism.

The lawsuit, filed by six other folks in September, bought monetary backing from major U.S.-based fully crypto alternate Coinbase. The criticism contests sanctions imposed on Twister Cash by the Treasury Division’s Office of International Assets Adjust (OFAC).

A summary judgment calls for a desire to rule on aspects of the case, in total when the occasion concerned has no prospect of successfully defending a claim. If granted, Wednesday’s movement also can scrutinize an official ruling on two of the three accounts raised.

The plaintiffs argued that the OFAC violated the moral to free speech clause in the U.S. Structure by banning an open-supply decentralized protocol relish Twister Cash.

They extra argued that immutable dapper contracts can’t be labeled “property” and that OFAC had exceeded its statutory authority in actioning the sanctions.

The OFAC sanctioned Twister Profit August, alleging it turned into as soon as old to launder bigger than $7 billion price of cryptocurrency since 2019, including $455 million stolen by the North Korean declare-subsidized cyber crime unit Lazarus Physique of workers.

“To ban all uses of Twister Cash is such as banning the printing press attributable to a cramped piece of customers also can submit instructions on straightforward learn the technique to amass a nuclear weapon,” read the movement.

(In an episode of The Cutting Block, Haseeb Qureshi, Tom Schmidt, Tarun Chitra and Laura Shin focus on why regulators are going after Twister Cash).